American infrastructure is
rapidly degrading. Already old and decrepit relative to other nations with
developed economic systems, a looming era of budget cuts and limited investment
across the board threatens to further undermine the United States' economic
competitiveness as key systems fail.
The collapse of the I-35
West bridge in Minneapolis in 2007
highlighted a silent but growing danger to the United States economy. For
decades engineers and scientists had been warning that the lifespan of major
construction projects launched in the 1930s and 1950s was coming to an end, and
that major reinvestment in infrastructure upgrades was required to stave off a
series of disasters across the United States. But political decision makers had
not responded with anything more useful than offering bureaucratic approval for
the reports, and little was done.
The bridge collapse in
Minneapolis made it impossible to continue ignoring the problem, and it was not
the last major event to highlight the decay of America's infrastructure. Small
bridges like that over Garrard Creek in
Washington State as well as the massive Bay Bridge that connects San Francisco
to Oakland have failed in full or in part since 2007 simply due to the poor
quality of routine repairs or heavy use. Other bridges have been lost to
floods, and even more bridges have been damaged by earthquakes but merely
shored up to keep them operating in the short term.
And bridge failures are
not the only aspect of US infrastructure that is rapidly degrading. US roads
are notoriously bad in many parts of the country. The railway system is beset
with accidents. Airports are extremely busy, and there are growing concerns
about the possibility of air accidents due to the crowded airspace.
Telecommunications is yet another area of concern - the US is one of the worst
rated industrialized nations when it comes to its wireless coverage and the
availability of internet access. And this in the nation that has largely
pioneered some of the most important technological innovations of the past
century!
Clearly something needs to be
done to reverse this trend of degradation and failure before it becomes
absolutely chronic. But, naturally, this growing crisis comes as the US remains
mired in an ongoing economic slump that is sapping public support for federal
spending and forcing local governments across the country to retrench and cut
programs that do not provide an immediate return on investment.
Paradoxically, it is this very
economic mess that actually provides a golden opportunity for the United States
to begin spending money and resources on infrastructure upgrades. In a time of
wretched employment statistics and struggling industry, a renewed Works
Progress Administration as used by the Roosevelt Administration in the Great
Depression of the 1930s offers the possibility of both pulling the US out of
its slump and renewing its core infrastructure systems at the same time.
The Great Depression was one
of the most critical points in US history, unique both in the depth of the
economic pain felt by most citizens of the nation as well as the threat of
social unrest that began to emerge in response to the ongoing stagnation. The
inability of successive administrations to mitigate the pain of the Depression
fed public dissatisfaction with the federal government and helped stimulate the
growth of extremist groups ranging along the ideological spectrum from
anarchists to fascists to communists. Germany and Italy had already regressed
from nascent democratic forms of government to fascist dictatorships, and the
Soviet Union happily backed communist parties worldwide in an attempt to
provide for its own military and economic security. That the United States
faced the threat of falling under the sway of a fascist or communist party has
largely been buried due to the success of the Roosevelt administration in
preserving capitalism and democracy, but at a time only seventy years after the
Civil War the threat of the United States falling apart was very real.
The Works Progress
Administration recognized the danger of masses of unemployed, desperate people.
Not because they would seek to overthrow the government or turn to violence,
but because they might be tempted to join and support radical parties that
could promise them a better future. The Roosevelt Administration recognized
that the US federal government was the only element of US society that could be
sufficiently functional to pursue a nationwide effort of economic amelioration
and investment. In addition, it recognized that the United States was still
largely a rural, agricultural country that was not living up to its potential
in terms of industrial production. Roads were bad in many parts of the country,
and the rail system had only recently been fully extended to reach more remote
areas. The ecological collapse in the Great Plains and the resulting Dust Bowl
had also made swaths of heavily populated, formerly productive agricultural
areas useless for their traditional purpose, and people were moving to cities
in hopes of finding jobs and opportunities to build a new life.
So the administration embarked
on the WPA: it would put any WPA supplicant to work building infrastructure
that would provide a powerful base for the development of a fully
industrialized country. It would give unemployed men a purpose in life, and help
them earn wages and basic necessities.
A new WPA for American
infrastructure holds significant promise for a nation that faces many of the
same challenges as were experienced in the Great Depression.
First, although unemployment
statistics are largely massaged by utilizing very specific economic definitions
of what constitutes an unemployed individual - for example, the well-known
caveat that someone who no longer seeks work is not considered
"unemployed" by official counts - the depth of the employment problem
since the Great Recession is still clear. Upwards of 25% of Americans are
unemployed, underemployed, or so discouraged by failed job hunts that they've
just given up. This is extremely disconcerting for both the unemployed and by
society, because this approaches Great Depression levels. And in a society
where few people are self-sufficient and rely on a steady income to buy food to
eat, this is potentially catastrophic. In some sectors, like the construction
and manufacturing industries, the pain is far worse than the averages signify.
Extremist groups are on the
rise as well. Although the Tea Party would vehemently deny it is extremist in
any way, historically speaking the people its rhetoric appeals to are those who
are most vulnerable to populist, extreme groups: the unemployed and those who
fear for the future. The longer people go without hope of living the life
they'd come to expect was standard in American society, the more likely they
will be to listen to someone - anyone - who promises something better.
The 1930s are back with a
vengeance, and something must be done. A new WPA offers hope on all counts.
A new WPA would scoop up the
long term unemployed from the housing, manufacturing, and construction sectors,
especially those with relevant skills in construction and manufacturing, and
put some of them to work churning out steel, concrete, and other construction
materials while others would begin using this material to start a comprehensive
updating and reconstruction of American infrastructure. It would utilize
government funds, possibly money budgeted for unemployment compensation,
retraining, and public assistance and pay people to work in the WPA.
Workers whose experience was
in technology and engineering could be employed to supervise less skilled
workers or in completely non-traditional infrastructure projects like the
expansion of fiber-optic connections to every
community in America and the construction of microwave towers to expand
cellular service and the reach of wireless internet connections. Computer
networks in schools and public agencies could be completely updated and
expanded to promote efficiency.
Disaster retrofitting could
also employ many people. Much of the Pacific Northwest will experience an
earthquake the size of those that devastated Indonesia in 2004 and much of
Japan in 2010, and this earthquake is very likely going to arrive in the next hundred
years. Fixing buildings in Seattle and Portland is a great need so that they
will be more likely to withstand the event when it comes. The quake will occur
offshore, so tsunami shelters could protect coastal residents. And the
Northwest isn't the only region not traditionally associated with quakes that
needs to be looked at: evidence points to major earthquakes in the Midwest and
Atlantic coast, and buildings need to be retrofitted to handle them.
Environmental catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina threaten every city on the
Atlantic seaboard, and it couldn't hurt to begin building emergency facilities
capable of mitigating such a disaster striking the Chesapeake Bay, New York, or
New England.
Environmental restoration is
another potential avenue of employment and investment. Replanting forests and
returning marginal agricultural land to wetlands would return much of the US to
a wildlife-friendly state, which benefits property values and the quality of
life nationwide.
A new WPA for American
infrastructure would also be capable of promoting investment in America's human
infrastructure. If whole families composed of WPA supplicants were relocated to
help work on big projects, their children could be enrolled in schools that
were geared towards meeting their needs. Both they and their kids could benefit
from targeted educational programs and training regimens that would help
children and adults alike prepare for the post-WPA world, when the economy
would be improving again and be demanding people with higher skillsets. Imagine
if the next generation of scientists and engineers could be trained in a new
WPA, who would have close, personal experience with major projects and thereby
a good understanding of the many issues that face them.
Of course, there is the
nagging problem of how to pay for a new WPA. But for all the concern about
public debt, politicians fail to point out that there is such a thing as good
debt. Few companies operate solely based on their cash reserves, and no startup company does. Borrowing money to buy a home is
qualitatively different than borrowing money to rent a home. Debt that is
incurred at reasonable rates and that actually provides a tangible benefit is
not a bad thing. Debt incurred to support frivolous consumption is the problem
that got America into its current mess, not federal debt spent on scientific
research or infrastructure renewal.
So levy limited, temporary
taxes on industries that will benefit from infrastructure upgrades, and punish
companies, governments, and people that over-contribute to their degradation.
Redirect military funding away from building military infrastructure like bases
and tanks that are good for only one thing, and not for producing value-added
goods and services.
A new WPA is sorely needed,
and would be a brave step towards reconstructing America. All that is needed is
a political party with the will to initiate it, and see it through.