Guidelines for Evaluating Safety Performance

 

A. Summary

UC Davis Policy and Procedure 290-15 and State law (Title 8 CCR, Section 3203) requires all members of the campus community be held accountable for injury and illness prevention. Department chairpersons and unit heads are required to maintain a safe work environment. This begins by ensuring the department has an active Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP), implemented effectively and reviewed annually, including developing safe work practices, job hazard assessments, and providing employees with methods to report hazards in the workplace. All supervisors are accountable for providing training on workplace hazards (i.e. review hazard assessments), safely operating equipment and using tools (i.e. by reviewing SOP’s or manuals), following safe work practices, and assuring all work is conducted safely. All employees are required to develop safe work habits to minimize injury/illness risk by following established safety procedures and practices, and by being proactive in managing their injury/illness risk in the performance of their duties.

B. Safety Performance Evaluations

Performance evaluations at all levels must include an assessment of the individual's commitment to, and performance of, the injury/illness prevention needs of his/her position. The following are examples of factors to consider when evaluating an employee's safety performance:

C. Special Requirements for Supervisors