We’ve
been discussing the mechanical advantage that
compound pulleys provide to humans during lifting operations and last
time we hit upon the fact that there comes a
point of diminished return, a reality that engineers must negotiate in their mechanical designs. Here we’ll
discuss one of the undesirable trade offs that
results in a diminished return within a compound pulley arrangement when we compute the length of rope
the Grecian man we’ve been following must grapple in order to lift his
urn. What we’ll discover is a situation of mechanical
overkill – like using a steamroller to squash a bug. Mechanical Overkill Just
how much rope does Mr. Toga need to extract from our working
example compound pulley to lift his urn two
feet above the ground? To find out we’ll need to revisit the
fact that the compound pulley is
a work input-output device. As
presented in a previous topic, the
equations for work input, WI, and work output, WO, we’ll be using are, WI =
F × d2 WO =
W × d1 Now,
ideally, in a compound pulley no
friction exists in the wheels to impede the rope’s movement, and that will be
our scenario today. Our next topic will deal with the more complex
situation where friction is present. So for our example
today, with no friction present, work input equals output… WI =
WO … and
this fact allows us to develop an equation in terms of the rope
length/distance factors in our compound pulley assembly, represented by d1 and
d2, … F × d2 =
W × d1 d2 ÷
d1 = W ÷ F Now,
from our old topic we know that W divided by F represents the mechanical
advantage, MA, to Mr. Toga of using the compound pulley, which was found to
be 16, equivalent to the sections of rope directly supporting the
urn. We’ll set the distance factors up in relation to MA,
and the equation becomes… d2 ÷
d1 = MA d2 =
MA × d1 d2 =
16 × 2 feet = 32 feet What
we discover is that in order to raise the urn 2 feet, our Grecian friend must
manipulate 32 feet of rope – which would only make sense if he were lifting
something far heavier than a 40 pound urn. In
reality, WI does not equal WO, due to the inevitable presence of
friction. Next time we’ll see how friction affects the
mechanical advantage in our compound pulley. |