Casting Designing Framework

To approach an ideal framework for designing a metal casting requires a detailed study of the contradictory requirements and identifying the best solution. The artifact’s designing, quality-benchmarking and cost-effective considerations play an important role to work out an ideal structure for metal casting.

Advantages of defining framework:

A clever designed casting is required to be competent on one hand and cost effective on the other. However, this technique of designing and creating castings is a complex job. Several considerations are required to define while crafting a framework of the cast and surprisingly, there’s no particular rule to distinguish them. Thus, it involves a thorough analysis of manufacturability and other production stages during the design phase of the metal casting.

Important considerations in the framework:

Table – 1.1 – Table showing minimum wall thickness chart of the common metals

Metal

Pattern Oversize Factor for each direction

Finish Allowance (smaller number for larger sizes)

Minimum Wall thickness mm (inches)

Aluminum cast alloys

1.08 - 1.12

0.5 to 1.0 %

4.75 (0.187)

Copper cast alloys

1.05 - 1.06

0.5 to 1.0 %

2.3 (0.094)

Gray Iron for casting

1.10

0.4 to 1.6 %

3.0 (0.125)

Nickel cast alloys

1.05

0.5 to 1.0 %

N/A

Steel cast

1.05 - 1.10

0.5 to 2 %

5 (0.20)

Magnesium cast alloys

1.07 - 1.10

0.5 to 1.0 %

4.0 (0.157)

Malleable Irons for casting

1.06 - 1.19

0.6 to 1.6 %

3.0 (0.125)

 

An approach towards defining solutions gives the competitive edge over struggle to control the production process within the initial stage of designing. It facilitates the base of implementing solutions to work for the benefits. Based on the above extensively differing, yet noteworthy perspective; cost effective metal casting designs can be achieved proficiently.