Powers and Functions of NHRC - Role of NHRC
§ NHRC of India is an independent statutory body established on 12 October, 1993 as per provisions of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, later amended in 2006.
§ NHRC has celebrated its Silver Jubilee (25 years) on October 12, 2018. Its headquarter is located in New Delhi.
§ It is the watchdog of human rights in the country, i.e. the rights related to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by Indian Constitution or embodied in the international covenants and enforceable by courts in India.
§ It was established in conformity with the Paris Principles, adopted for the promotion and protection of human rights in Paris (October, 1991) and endorsed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 December, 1993.
v Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948.
v It is a milestone declaration in the history of human rights which sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected.
v Human Rights Day is observed every year on 10 December, which is the anniversary of the UDHR. In 2018, Human Rights Day marked the 70th anniversary the declaration.
v In due time the growing importance of strengthening national human rights institutions has been recognized and in 1991, a UN meeting in Paris has developed a detailed set of principles i.e. Paris Principles. These principles became the foundation for the establishment and operation of national human rights institutions.
v In pursuant to these principles, India has enacted the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, with a view to bring about greater accountability and strengthening of the human rights in the country.
v This act also authorized State Governments to establish State Human Right Commission.
Structure of the Commission
§ NHRC is a multi-member body which consists of a Chairman and seven other members. Out of the seven members, three are ex-officio member.
§ President appoints the Chairman and members of NHRC on recommendation of high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister.
§ The Chairperson and the members of the NHRC are appointed for 5 years or till the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier.
§ They can be removed only on the charges of proved misbehavior or incapacity, if proved by an inquiry conducted by a Supreme Court Judge.
§ Commission also has five Specialized Divisions i.e. Law Division, Investigation Division, Policy Research & Programmes Division, Training Division and Administration Division.
§ The chairman and the members of State Commission are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Minister, Home Minister, Speaker of Legislative Assembly and Leader of the Opposition in the State Legislative Assembly.
Functions and Powers of NHRC
NHRC investigates grievances regarding the violation of human rights either suo moto or after receiving a petition.
It has the power to interfere in any judicial proceedings involving any allegation of violation of human rights.
It can visit any jail or any other institution under the control of the State Government to see the living conditions of the inmates and to make recommendations thereon.
It can review the safeguards provided under the constitution or any law for the protection of the human rights and can recommend appropriate remedial measures.
NHRC undertakes and promotes research in the field of human rights.
NHRC works to spread human rights literacy among various sections of society and promotes awareness of the safeguards available for the protection of these rights through publications, media, seminars and other means.
The Commission takes an independent stand while providing opinions for the protection of human rights within the parlance of the Constitution or in law for the time being enforced.
It has the powers of a civil court and can grant interim relief.
It also has the authority to recommend payment of compensation or damages.
NHRC credibility is duly reflected in large number of complaints received every year and the trust reposed in it by the citizens.
It can recommend to both the central and state governments to take suitable steps to prevent the violation of Human Rights. It submits its annual report to the President of India who causes it to be laid before each House of Parliament.
Limitations of NHRC
§ NHRC does not have any mechanism of investigation. In majority cases, it asks the concerned Central and State Governments to investigate the cases of the violation of Human Rights
§ It has been termed as ‘India’s teasing illusion’ by Soli Sorabjee (former Attorney-General of India) due to its incapacity to render any practical relief to the aggrieved party.
§ NHRC can only make recommendations, without the power to enforce decisions.
§ Many times NHRC is viewed as post-retirement destinations for judges and bureaucrats with political affiliation moreover, inadequacy of funds also hamper its working.
§ A large number of grievances go unaddressed because NHRC cannot investigate the complaint registered after one year of incident.
§ Government often out rightly rejects recommendation of NHRC or there is partial compliance to these recommendations.
§ State human rights commissions cannot call for information from the national government, which means that they are implicitly denied the power to investigate armed forces under national control.
§ National Human Rights Commission powers related to violations of human rights by the armed forces have been largely restricted.
Suggestions
Ø There is need for complete revamping of NHRC to make it more effective and truly a watchdog of human right violations in the country.
Ø NHRC efficacy can be enhanced by government if commission decisions are made enforceable.
Ø There is need to change in composition of commission by including members from civil society and activists.
Ø NHRC needs to develop an independent cadre of staff with appropriate experience.
Ø Many laws in India are very old and archaic in nature by amending which government can bring more transparency in regulations.
Ø To improve and strengthen the human rights situation in India, state and non state actors need to work in tandem.