This article
describes the technical aspects of Performing Mesh analysis with Dependent
Sources.
Mesh analysis is a very handy
tool to compute current within electronic circuits. From knowing the current
within each mesh (section), we can solve for voltage and power (watts) at each
component. Engineers and designers use this information to select correct parts
that won’t emit the magic white smoke when power is applied.
We can divide the example
above into two meshes, I1 and
I2. I1 designates a virtual current in mesh 1. I2shows virtual current in mesh 2. Mesh
current flow is usually depicted in a clockwise direction. From here, we write
each mesh as a linear equation and use a solving tool to find I1 and I2.
Using Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law
(KVL), mesh I1 would be written as:
−3 v+100Ω(I1)+200Ω(I1−I2)=0−3
v+100Ω(I1)+200Ω(I1−I2)=0
The I1-I2 is because the current flowing thru the center 200Ω
resistor is the difference between the two meshes. Due to the clockwise flow of
I1, the (-) side of the battery is
recorded as the voltage.
This formula can be rewritten
as:
I1(300Ω)−I2(200Ω)=3 vI1(300Ω)−I2(200Ω)=3
v
Mesh I2 can be described in electrical
terms as:
6
v+100Ω(I2)+200Ω(I2−I1)+200Ω(I2)=06
v+100Ω(I2)+200Ω(I2−I1)+200Ω(I2)=0
Simplified and rewritten,
this comes out to:
−I1(200Ω)+I2(500Ω)=−6
v−I1(200Ω)+I2(500Ω)=−6
v
Here is an online linear equation solver (which will make
the solving much simpler). To minimize the chance of symbols being
misunderstood, it is best to rename I1 to “a” and I2 to
“b”.
The finished query is:
300a−200b=3300a−200b=3
, [Equation
1]
and,
−200a+500b=−6−200a+500b=−6
[Equation
2]
The answers are:
I1(“a”)=31100
A−−−−−−I1(“a”)=31100 A_
or
2.727
mA2.727 mA
,
and,
I2(“b”)=−3275
A−−−−−−−I2(“b”)=−3275
A_
or
−10.909 mA−10.909 mA
Remember that the current in
the center 200-Ω resistor is (I1 – I2). So,
2.727 mA–(−10.909 mA)=13.636
mA−−−−−−−−−2.727
mA–(−10.909 mA)=13.636 mA_
The batteries would be
considered as an independent voltage source. What would happen if we replaced
one of them with a voltage controlled voltage source (VCVS), such as a vacuum
tube or FET circuit?
The formula for the I1 mesh would be identical to the
previous example.
It is:
I1(300Ω)−I2(200Ω)=3 vI1(300Ω)−I2(200Ω)=3
v
or for the solver:
300a−200b=3300a−200b=3
[Equation
3]
Mesh I2 contains the VCVS dependent
voltage source. The gain is noted by the 5VX and the source of the control
voltage is seen as the nodes on each side of the center resistor.
The formula for I2 is no more
complicated than it is for I1.
Starting at the 200-Ω
resistor and using KVL we have:
200Ω(I2−I1)–5VX+300Ω(I2)=0200Ω(I2−I1)–5VX+300Ω(I2)=0
.
In a more usable and
condensed form, the equation is:
−I1(200Ω)+I2(500Ω)=5VX−I1(200Ω)+I2(500Ω)=5VX
[Equation4]
The dependent voltage source
is a ratio and not a fixed number at this point. To be able to solve this
system, we need to write the formula for VX. This is found multiplying the
resistance 200 Ω by the current.
Since this resistor is used
by both meshes, the current is:
I1−I2I1−I2
VX is:
200Ω(I1−I2)200Ω(I1−I2)
[Equation
5]
VX will be annotated as “c” for the
solver.
Putting the three linear
equations (Equations 3, 4 and 5) into a Wolfram Alpha friendly syntax, we have:
300a−200b=3300a−200b=3
,
−200a+500b=5c−200a+500b=5c
,
c=200(a−b)c=200(a−b)
The results of the equation
are: I1 has a current of 21.429 mA, I2 has a current of 17.143 mA, and VX has a voltage of 0.857 Volts. Our
dependent source has a gain of 5 and therefore is producing 4.286 Volts. At
this point someone is thinking “Hey, wait a minute. Why does I1 have more current in the second
example if the dependent source’s voltage is lower than the battery it
replaced?” Nice catch! We swapped the polarity for the dependent source and
both I1 and I2 currents jumped. Hopefully this
was planned and our circuit isn’t smoking like a sock in the toaster.
Other dependent sources
include Current Controlled Voltage Sources (CCVS), Voltage Controlled Current
Sources (VCCS), and Current Controlled Current Sources (CCCS). A bipolar
junction transistor is a good example of a CCCS.
The comprehension of mesh
analysis with dependent sources is important when planning circuits that
utilize amplifiers or amplifying components. The methods are nearly the same as
without dependent sources except that more information needs to be presented to
achieve a solution.