Let us take a look at a case study which is named as − The Perfectionism of Larry Wells. Larry Wells, a successful businessman and a good negotiator had acquired a major retailer after seeing good business potential in it. Through his excellent managing skills and hard work he could use all his experience of business and start a profitable venture. When the business grew, he employed more and more staff to keep up with the demands at the workplace. However, he had a strictly confidential manner of managing the operations.
Being the manager of the
company and the owner of the business, he kept the dealings and numbers close
to his chest. His hesitation in sharing details about the business extended to
all the managers, even directors of the company. Despite requests from the
staff to trust them with decisions and details, he wouldn’t divulge details
which he thought only he should be privy to. Because of the lack of autonomy
among managers of different departments, there were many areas on which they
couldn’t take timely decisions, and had to wait for Larry to give them his
attention.
As business was expanding,
this process of working made Larry lag behind all his competitors soon. All
important decisions were put on hold till he could spare time for it. This
method of pulling all the strings himself had ensured high quality of output in
the initial stages, however dealing with every situation personally was
disastrous time-management.
The clients who had given more
business to Larry’s company, after being impressed by the quality of output
seen during the company’s initial years, began looking for faster and more
efficient service-providers. Ultimately Larry’s company was sold out to another
big organization, never realizing the full potential it had in its initial
years.
Micro-managing resources is
often the most common pitfall that first-time managers fall into. Because the
project is new and the experience of managing is also first-time, a new manager
feels the pressure of impressing his seniors by delivering excellent output, so
that he can justify the management’s decision of promoting him. This approach
may appear fine to begin with, when the manager tries to get a first-hand
experience of the process and tries to understand its functioning. However,
when the work starts to expand and additional efforts are needed to keep the
efficiency going, the company will hire more resources to keep up with the
demand.
If the manager does not give
up his micro-managing nature during this time, he will keep the entire team
held up for him to take the final important decisions and steps. He will stall
all other processes and departments while inspecting the progress of one
department, which will cost the entire team a lot of time.
At this stage, a manager needs
to stop micro-managing and allow freedom of functioning and autonomy to his
team and trust them to come up with ways to handle any situations that may
arise in his absence.