Some of the most common
strategies along which Organizational Grouping is done
are behavior, function, product, customer,
market and matrix. People are assigned teams based on these lines of
functioning and are given instructions and their objectives and the managers
are entrusted with the successful implementation.
After delegating work to different
departments, the management then decides the hierarchy of reporting of the
departments and selects the ones whose managers will report to them directly
regarding progresses and areas of concern. All these types of organization
represent a structure for an organization’s design, where there is a clear
chain of hierarchy and flow of communication.
Some of the most important design models are given below −
● Functional Organizational Design Model
● Geographical Organizational Design Model
● Product-oriented Organizational Design
Model
● Market-oriented Organizational Design
Model
● Matrix Structure Organizational Design
Model
Let us now discuss in detail
each one of these design models and see how they help organizations in their
functioning.
Organizations that implement
the functional model of organizational design divide their functioning into
different fields. For example, there will be different boxes for different
departments like marketing, finance, sales, legal, R&D and HR, etc. These
departments will have their own separate board-level departments and
sub-departments. This structural arrangement is reminiscent of the military
line of command, where a strict pyramidal hierarchy and chain of action was
observed.
The size and sub-divisions of
each department varies according to the business needs. For example, if it is a
law firm, their legal department will be more populated and sub-divided as
compared to their R&D Department. Some organizations merge their Sales
Department with the Marketing Department, so that the managers can work in-sync
and bring ideas that support each other’s functioning.
Functional organizational
structures are best for self-contained working units, such as a small company
or a freelance-assignment team. The downside to this structure is that because
of the strict hierarchical framework, issues tend to escalate to the vertical
reporting authority, rather than getting sorted out by mutual understanding
between two lateral units.
A typical functional organizational structure would look like this −
As long as organizations
remained localized, it was considered that the functional design is best suited
for running business. However, when companies expanded and started operating
beyond international boundaries, there was a need felt for a globalized model,
which considers all the geography-influenced factors like local festivals,
culture, communication style, way of conducting business, etc.
A boss is a very formal,
distant and authoritative figure in Russia, unlike the “team player” bosses
that are the norm in the USA. To address such issues, multinational
organizations started adopting to a geographical organizational structure.
Geographical organizational
structure is tailor-made to suit the workings of an organization which has
business presence in different countries and wants to understand the native
culture of that place in order to understand its customers better. In this
model, the top management employs local decision-makers to implement plans
suited to local sensibilities. However, there is a potential issue with the
usage of this organizational model by a company, which wants to have a global
brand identity and has strong core values that it wants to be practiced in all
cultures. In such situations, friction often arises between the regional
offices and head office.
A typical geographical organizational structure would look like this −
In such models, the
organization designs itself are based on its products. For example, a company
that manufactures domestic electrical appliances may divide its business model
on its prime-selling products, such as fans, water pumps, etc. Each product
will have its own set of operations, employees, offers, etc.
This model works best in
organizations that provide entrepreneurial opportunities to people with good
business ideas. These people are made managers and an entire unit is assigned
to them. In such a competitive environment, where different product lines are
being run by separate teams dedicated to its marketing, promotion and sales; rivalry
is sure to develop. This rivalry is healthy for business. However, if not
nurtured in a healthy way, it can lead to bitter conflict after a particular
stage.
A typical product-oriented organizational structure would look like this −
In a market-oriented
organization model, the focus of the company is in addressing the needs of the
customers, as opposed to manufacturing products and creating the market for
them, which the food industry often does. These models revolve around the
logistics of serving a small number of customers, who can give them the
business they need to be profitable. In such cases, it is very often to find an
entire plant dedicated to manufacturing just a single line of products.
A few notable examples of
organizations that adopt this model are from the automobile industry. Companies
like BMW, Ferrari, Ducati, etc. have a niche customer base. These companies
cater only to their customer base. The less number of customers gives a good
opportunity for the sales managers to build strong business relationships with
their clients. The customers also appreciate the personalized touch and
enhanced customer service.
Such models work best when
high quality assurance is given and the business growth depends more on
interpersonal skills and relationship-building, as opposed to heavy
advertisements and promotion.
A typical product-oriented organizational structure would look like this −
Matrix Structures are used
when there is a high demand from the customers as well as a fundamental need to
ensure efficiency and bureaucracy. This structure is used when projects
employing many people are implemented and the clients want one organization
whom they can entrust for the successful implementation of their plan. A few
such sectors are construction, architecture, civil engineering, etc.
In this model, an employee reports to two bosses at the same time − one, an immediate supervisor and the other one the manager of the process. This results in role conflict and authority-related issues. If the supervisor and manager end up giving two conflicting or opposing instructions, then the employee gets stuck between two authorities.
A typical Matrix organizational structure would look like this −
In spite of these different
organizational models, companies don’t have to stick to just one organizational
model for all their businesses. In fact, many multinational companies implement
product-oriented organizational design models in one country, whereas operating
on a matrix model in some other country. Successful companies manage to find
scopes of usage of all these models in different places and processes.