Many people mistake Organization
Design with Organizational Structure. In this chapter, we
will understand the difference between both.
Organizational Structure is
related to mapping out the different departments of an organization and the
different teams working in each department, their hierarchical order, their
goals and objectives. It also illustrates the roles and responsibilities given
to different responsibilities.
A typical Organization Structure illustration looks like the following illustration −
On the other hand,
Organizational Design is related to aligning functions, processes, strategies,
responsibilities and roles to different members of team and departments within
the context of the various processes and products that the company produces.
When asked to imagine an Organization,
people tend to picture a big glass building in a big campus with state-of-art
facilities, bright corridors and teams upon teams of people working on
different floors. It brings a surprised look in their eyes when they are told
that every one of them has worked in an organization irrespective of the fact
that they have ever stepped inside an office or not in their entire lives. If
you are surprised too, then you are in a good company, because people relate to
organizations with names like UNO, World Bank.
This issue arises from a
fundamental misunderstanding in the meaning of the term Organization. We know that
organizations consist of people working in big buildings. However, it is
interesting to think if the buildings themselves are a part of the
organization, even if the company owns it.
The answers to such questions
were answered up to a great extent by Jim McNamara, who said that an
organization in its most basic definition can apply to a single person too.
According to him, an organization is either a person or group of people with an
organized approach to complete an individual or collective goal with either an
individual reward or collective reward in expectation.
The mission of any
organization is identifying and conceptualizing the common purpose that binds
the team-members together as one enterprise. This mission statement is often
shared between members of the company and stakeholders to make them aware of the
purpose and objectives of the organization.
There is a
difference between Mission and Vision, though.
● Vision − A Vision or Vision Statement tells what
an organization should achieve and be in (n) years. It is related to trying to
accurately predict the future of business and make preparations from now on. It
tries to set a benchmark that the organization is supposed to achieve in a
given number of years. Companies without a vision are perceived as self-centered who are resistant in adopting to change
with passage of time.
● Mission − In simple words, a Mission or Mission
Statement explains what an organization does as its basic function. A Vision
Statement tells what an organization should achieve and be in (n) years.
For example, many companies,
most notably Nokia, faced bankruptcy due to their being too fixated on their
present success to design a framework for the future.
While the vision statement
explains where the company should be headed in (n) years, business strategy is
all about getting the business there. Strategy need not be long-term planning
only; it may be short-term too and represents the methods through which a
company’s vision is realized.
Business Strategies decide the
products and services that an organization will produce, the choice of
technologies using which the products and services are designed, the
development of these products, their pricing, marketing and distribution. It
also involves finding competitive ways to counter rival companies.
Once the organization draws
out a mission and vision statement and finalizes a strategy on how to achieve
these, the managers start to draw the framework, delegate responsibilities and
recruit people as valuable resources and train them to deliver on objectives.
The HRs take over these responsibilities after deciding upon the cost to the
company (CTC) and the other motivation-oriented performance incentives.
Once the resources have been
recruited, they are provided intensive training into the products and services
and are inducted into their jobs. Their performances are subject to periodic
informal reviews, during which their supervisor will identify issues in their
working style and guide the employees, so that they can address these issues.
After the probation period,
during which the newly appointed recruits are kept under guidance-driven
observation, they will be subjected to a periodic formal review process, during
which their performances will be evaluated and feedback will be shared.
In today’s world of globalized
business-dealing, no company can afford to operate in strict silo structures.
Every company has to keep a tab of its working process. It needs to keep
conducting reviews and scans to its working environment to see what further
improvements it can bring in its workforce.