Organizational culture
includes a set of norms, routines, and unspoken rules of how things are done in
that organization. An organization’s culture can be in different states of
maturity, and these can be assessed using a variety of organizational and KM maturity
models.
A maturity model is defined as
a descriptive model of the stages through which organizations progress as they
define, implement, evolve, and improve their processes.
This model acts as a guide for
selecting process, improvement strategies by assisting the determination of the
current process capabilities and the identification of issues most critical to
quality and process improvement within a particular domain, like software
engineering or systems engineering.
There are a number of
organizational and KM maturity models, mostly derived from the Capability
Maturity Model (CMM).
The CMM was developed to
describe the phases of software development processes, and the model was
subsequently updated to the Capability Maturity Model Integration in 2000 (CMMI
Project Team, 2002) in a better way.
The Capability Maturity Model describes five evolutionary levels in which an organization manages its processes. The five stages of the CMM are as follows −
● Initial − Processes are improvised, chaotic, rarely
defined.
● Repeatable − Basic processes are established, and a
level of discipline is maintained to stick to these processes.
● Defined − All processes are precisely defined,
documented, standardized, and integrated into each other.
● Managed − Processes are managed by collecting detailed
data on the processes and their quality requirements.
● Optimizing − Continuous process improvement is
affiliated and in place by quantitative feedback and from piloting new ideas
and technologies.
Again, five maturity levels are specified, and each level is characterized by the efficiency of the knowledge life cycle, which consists of −
● Knowledge Acquisition
● Knowledge Dissemination
● Knowledge Reuse
● The only way to create organizational
knowledge is through formal training.
● There is a lack of management of
knowledge.
● Knowledge is only shared when there is a need for it.
● A basic KM system is developed and meets
business requirements.
● Knowledge-sharing activities are
sportingly encouraged.
● The advantages of KM are beginning to be
realized.
● Enterprise-wide KM system has been rooted.
● Quality and usage of contents are assured.
● Reuse of knowledge at a project level.
● Knowledge sharing becomes a part of
organizational culture.
● Organizational boundaries are discarded.
● Knowledge processes are continuously progressed.
The Wenger CoP life-cycle model provides a good characteristic to
assess whether informal networks exist within an organization and whether they
are recognized and supported by the organization.
The life-cycle model shows
that a community requires to have attained the maturity and stewardship of
knowledge levels in order to begin creating value for its members and for the
organization as a whole.
The key features of the maturity model are as follows −
● Paulk organizational
Maturity − represents the approval of a new
technology or process within an enterprise, which is a very good match for the
introduction of new KM functions.
● Fujitsu organizational
Maturity − provides a fast and easy way of assessing
how united or pervasive a culture is within a given enterprise, which can
provide valuable guidance either in selecting pilot KM sites, if the enterprise
is in the earlier stages, or in focusing on closely aligning KM with the
overall business strategy.
● Paulzen and Perc Maturity − It is quite similar to the Infosys KM
model and grants for incremental introduction of KM initiatives into an
organization based on the phase of KM maturity.
● Forrester Group KM maturity − A model that marks on how employees
acquire model relevant content, which is particularly well suited for an
incremental introduction of knowledge support services within an organization.