Candidates appear for
interviews, and subsequent rounds of evaluation during which the management
determines their skill, aptitude, temperament and knowledge. Depending on the
company, the management also administers annually, bi-annually, even quarterly
assessments. These assessments also help them in determining which process an
employee would be more suited to work in, depending on his profile.
There are two types of assessments that an employee goes through −
● Pre-screening − this type of screening is used to get
information about a candidate, his experience, skills, and record before hiring
them. This helps companies avoid recruiting a person with shady reputation, or
questionable intent.
● Knowledge Screening − candidates often confuse this screening
as a part of the recruitment process itself, however people get screened here
before being interviewed by the HR personnel. This screening follows a questionnaire
format with process-specific questions having a set of multiple-choice options
from which the candidate is supposed to select the right one.
Performance reviews are
defined as “the task of assessing a performance within a specific duration of
working, measuring it up with the expectations, and seeing how much of the
objectives have been achieved”.
Every employee has his own way
of handling a performance review, however, they all expect a checklist of important
areas to be considered while getting a review of their performance. Some of
these important areas are discussed below.
The employee and the HR
personnel must be made aware of the review, especially the employee so that he
can come prepared with a list of his achievements and inputs, along with data
to back his claims. This may include a lot of one-one Q&As and
involve plenty of discussion.
Performances are what drive an
organization, so while reviewing performances, best practices are to keep it
utmost priority so that no other task conflicts schedules with it.
The employee mustn’t be made
to feel that he is undergoing an interrogation session. The atmosphere needs to
be understandably formal, however that doesn’t mean humor can’t
be tastefully used. The person should feel he is getting a fair opportunity at
presenting his point across.
While taking down notes, it’s
important for the management to reiterate the expectations on the employee by
the management, and how the objectives given to the employees contribute to the
big picture.
The employee should be clear
on the objective of the meeting from the beginning. This is where a timely memo
helps. If the employee veers off-course during the course of discussion, it’s
the job of the manager to bring the discussion back on track.
While discussing the
employee’s performances, it’s always best to not only be objective and fair,
but also empathetic. People generally tend to take feedback personally as a
question on their talent or capability, hence such situations must be avoided.
The employee must feel that he
got ample time and freedom to speak his mind and express himself clearly. This
will help him in putting forth his questions in a better way, which will
improve the HR’s understanding of the person and his motivations.
In a competitive environment,
there will always be very good performers who would be genuinely good at their
jobs, and who would be exceeding expectations. They might not have any “areas
of improvements” per se’, however, such performers may be handed personal goals
to meet so that they find the motivation and drive in their jobs.
The employee should be told of
the follow-up date, which is the time when the meeting will be called again to
check the improvements and outcomes of the meeting. The HR will explain the set
of expectations/goals and mention the duration to achieve them.
The meeting should end on a
positive note, where the employee will have a renewed perspective on what the
company wants of him, and an action-plan on how he can work things out. He
should also be given the assurance that he can feel free to approach the
manager whenever he has any queries in mind.