Building
Costs
Construction cost of a
building usually is a dominant design concern. One reason is that if
construction cost exceeds the owner’s budget, the owner may cancel the project.
Another reason is that costs, such as property taxes and insurance, that occur
after completion of the building often are proportional to the initial cost.
Hence, owners usually try to keep that cost low. Designing a building to
minimize construction cost, however, may not be in the owner’s best interests.
There are many other costs that the owner incurs during the anticipated life of
the building that should be taken into account.
Before construction of a
building starts, the owner generally has to make a sizable investment in the
project. The major portion of this expenditure usually goes for purchase of the
site and building design. Remaining preconstruction costs include those for
feasibility studies, site selection and evaluation, surveys, and program
definition.
The major portion of the
construction cost is the sum of the payments to the general contractor and
prime contractors. Remaining construction costs usually consist of interest on
the construction loan, permit fees, and costs of materials, equipment, and
labour not covered by the construction contracts.
The initial cost to the
owner is the sum of preconstruction, construction, and occupancy costs. The
latter covers costs of moving possessions into the building and start-up of
utility services, such as water, gas, electricity, and telephone. After the
building is occupied, the owner incurs costs for operation and maintenance of
the buildings. Such costs are a consequence of decisions made during building
design.
Often, preconstruction
costs are permitted to be high so that initial costs can be kept low. For
example, operating the building may be expensive because the design makes
artificial lighting necessary when daylight could have been made available or
because extra heating and air conditioning are necessary because of inadequate
insulation of walls and roof. As another example, maintenance may be expensive
because of the difficulty of changing electric lamps or because cleaning the
building is time-consuming and laborious. In addition, frequent repairs may be
needed because of poor choice of materials during design. Hence, operation and
maintenance costs over a specific period of time, say 10 or 20 years, should be
taken into account in optimizing the design of a building.
Life-cycle cost is the
sum of initial, operating, and maintenance costs. Generally, it is life-cycle
cost that should be minimized in building design rather than construction cost.
This would enable the owner to receive the greatest return on the investment in
the building. ASTM has promulgated a standard method for calculating life-cycle
costs of buildings, E917, Practice for Measuring Life-Cycle Costs of Buildings
and Building Systems, as well as a computer program and user’s guide to improve
accuracy and speed of calculation.
Nevertheless, a client
usually establishes a construction budget independent of life-cycle cost. This
often is necessary because the client does not have adequate capital for an
optimum building and places too low a limit on construction cost. The client
hopes to have sufficient capital later to pay for the higher operating and
maintenance costs or for replacement of undesirable building materials and
installed equipment. Sometimes, the client establishes a low construction
budget because the client’s goal is a quick profit on early sale of the
building, in which case the client has little or no concern with future high
operating and maintenance costs for the building. For these reasons,
construction cost frequently is a dominant concern in design.